Rami Harcsztark 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
+Alexandru Valentin Iedu 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
PRO ...Giorgos Fidanas 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
proClaude Coeudevez 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
i like it !pro
Der Zacki 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
-Geoff Ashton 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
like theosorry c
Jürgen Cron 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
++Andrej Nagode 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
+Véronique Soulier 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
no sorryMichael Henderson 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
Nice but not gallery IMO.Theo Weijmer 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
I think when using the PS trickery it should be more convincing, in this I think it is to obvious that it is edited.Robert Riley 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
Nice idea but not Gallery.Luc Grollie 17/12/2007 11:23 Commentaire de vote
digiart is not nature, like the editing though......C
Inez Correia Marques 17/12/2007 11:22 Commentaire de vote
I LIKE THE EFFECT.PRO
aw masry 17/12/2007 11:22 Commentaire de vote
I'm not sure about the logical "Depth of Field".In compare with left side, how can the right side have much blurring. As you know it's same measure from you
Actually i like the original. Surely, It is gallery material.
S