Lost3 photo et image | portrait, people Images fotocommunity
Lost3 photo et image de Denise Woerdman ᐅ Regarde la photo gratuitement sur fotocommunity.fr. Découvre ici d'autres images.
@ Ruud,
Well I am not new to the FC...and yes I agree you are one of the few providing his/her view to almost every picture in the voting and you deserve my respect for it! I also find your idea of constructive critique good, but it is definitely not the case up to now. What I see (with the rare exceptions I mentioned) are just comments like "+", "-", "sorry", "this is not gallery" and "skip"...which aren't very constructive I suppose. On the other hand I also believe that you cannot always rationally argue why you like or dislike a picture...for example in this case, do people like this kind of surreal image and this kind of humour, do they like set up pictures, or not (technically I believe there is not much negative to say...). Unless technical issues, but the personal feeling about a picture has nothing to do with constructive critique...so I am afraid that with this picture it will be all about personal feelings ;-)
Denise's series is harlarious and very creative. The colour balance is perfect considering a number of different light sources. Well done Denise - What's next?
@ Ruud: sorry but who are you to tell others what they should do and blaming them ? As I figure it out, some people here love to share their vote and others don't, and I respect both. I belong to the second category and I can assure you I am not only voting contra. So leave people alone with their approach and do not feel offended!
@Ruud. You know very well that I am very pro always make a comment. In the past you have defended those who don't. As a Channel manager you gave all sorts of excuses where nothing could be done!
At last I see some committment to getting members to make a comment!
Great humourous stuff. Shame it is so small. I like frames but this shot would be better without.
I'm going to give it a pro anyway for humour, composition, contrast and that little bit of cheek! Kathryn
@ Ruud, as you know, a lot of votes and a few comments, means the most of them are contra`s. But those sodds has no guts to say it straight in mens face. Feel sorry for them.
By the way, pro for me
Insérez le lien suivant dans le champ de commentaire de la conversation désirée dans Messenger en utilisant 'Coller' pour envoyer cette image dans le message.
Copier le lien...
Clique, STP, sur le lien et utilise la combinaison de touches "Ctrl C" [Win] ou "Cmd C" le [Mac] autour du lien à copier.
Marc Erpelding 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
@ Ruud,Well I am not new to the FC...and yes I agree you are one of the few providing his/her view to almost every picture in the voting and you deserve my respect for it! I also find your idea of constructive critique good, but it is definitely not the case up to now. What I see (with the rare exceptions I mentioned) are just comments like "+", "-", "sorry", "this is not gallery" and "skip"...which aren't very constructive I suppose. On the other hand I also believe that you cannot always rationally argue why you like or dislike a picture...for example in this case, do people like this kind of surreal image and this kind of humour, do they like set up pictures, or not (technically I believe there is not much negative to say...). Unless technical issues, but the personal feeling about a picture has nothing to do with constructive critique...so I am afraid that with this picture it will be all about personal feelings ;-)
Dennis Veldman 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
the prints are without a frame, i have seen her working on these photographs ;)PRO!
Keep it up DeniSe!
Anastasiya Ivanova 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
+Patrick B. Parenteau 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
Denise's series is harlarious and very creative. The colour balance is perfect considering a number of different light sources. Well done Denise - What's next?Dragomir Vukovic 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
skipMarc Erpelding 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
@ Ruud: sorry but who are you to tell others what they should do and blaming them ? As I figure it out, some people here love to share their vote and others don't, and I respect both. I belong to the second category and I can assure you I am not only voting contra. So leave people alone with their approach and do not feel offended!Robert Riley 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
@Ruud. You know very well that I am very pro always make a comment. In the past you have defended those who don't. As a Channel manager you gave all sorts of excuses where nothing could be done!At last I see some committment to getting members to make a comment!
My comment is that this is .....Not gallery!
Sarah D. Kiefer 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
lots of imagination and i'm glad that dave donaldson knows where his pony is...safe and sound.cheers,
sarah k
oh...pro.
Abdul Khaliq 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
-Mark Johnston 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
oooooh the drama. I refuse to say what I vote.Dave Donaldson 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
That's were me Shetland ponies gone , been missing for weeks !!Works when you look at the series pro+++
KasiaDesign 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
Great humourous stuff. Shame it is so small. I like frames but this shot would be better without.I'm going to give it a pro anyway for humour, composition, contrast and that little bit of cheek! Kathryn
Véronique Soulier 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
skipCees Kuijs 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
@ Ruud, as you know, a lot of votes and a few comments, means the most of them are contra`s. But those sodds has no guts to say it straight in mens face. Feel sorry for them.By the way, pro for me
r o l f WENGENroth 22/02/2007 21:32 Commentaire de vote
_